Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2008, 03:49 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default ADW situation - Lets see if I understand correctly

In this article in regards to the Bealuh situation, the below quote...

http://news.bloodhorse.com/article/47901.htm

Quote:
On Nov. 4, Weiss said he determined that in 2007, Churchill Downs Inc.-owned TwinSpires.com handled $2.7 and provided $277,000—10%--to purses from a combination of host and source-market fees. The information about TwinSpires.com and possible closure of the barn area were noted on the Beulah Park overnight for Nov. 7.

Horsemen in Ohio and other states have been negotiating for a larger share of ADW revenue for horsemen and racetracks. They generally advocate a one-third split among horsemen, tracks, and ADW providers—about 7% each based on a blended takeout rate of 21% per dollar wagered.
Would it be correct to say that the horseman are trying to get the below

2.7 million handled by TS.com
900k to purses
900k to track
900k to ADW

Or do I have this all wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2008, 03:58 PM
mes5107's Avatar
mes5107 mes5107 is offline
Golden Gate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jewett City, CT
Posts: 394
Default

2.7 million handled x 21% average blended takeout is $567,000, of which:
$189k to purses
$189k to track
$189k to ADW
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2008, 03:59 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
In this article in regards to the Bealuh situation, the below quote...

http://news.bloodhorse.com/article/47901.htm



Would it be correct to say that the horseman are trying to get the below

2.7 million handled by TS.com
900k to purses
900k to track
900k to ADW

Or do I have this all wrong?
ya gotta pay the bettors too.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2008, 04:07 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
ya gotta pay the bettors too.
yeah I know, forgot about that

Honestly, in looking at it, I really side with the horseman and the tracks(I am sure they are glad to know this).

Why should TS keep $320k when all they do is process the damn wager, I see how they have to get their piece and be profitable, but almost 53% of the takeout is ridiculous
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2008, 04:10 PM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
yeah I know, forgot about that

Honestly, in looking at it, I really side with the horseman and the tracks(I am sure they are glad to know this).

Why should TS keep $320k when all they do is process the damn wager, I see how they have to get their piece and be profitable, but almost 53% of the takeout is ridiculous
Where are you getting this 53% figure?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2008, 04:19 PM
mes5107's Avatar
mes5107 mes5107 is offline
Golden Gate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jewett City, CT
Posts: 394
Default

I think that most ADW's cannot sustain a 40-50% cut in revenues either. I can see from both sides, and I'm afraid there isn't one side that is right and one side that is wrong. I do agree that the ADW's are getting too much of a share right now.

Speaking about getting too much of a share, how about offshore books? Is there any possibility we could have them commingle their money into the US and Canadian pools?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-04-2008, 04:19 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob
Where are you getting this 53% figure?
They said they paid 277k, so if you take the 567k figure that Mes posted.

I have it as them paying 49% of the take back to the purses, so they are keeping 51% of it.

So 53% was incorrect, I am just trying to understand it, so I can figure out a solution, and then make a bunch of money on the solution
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2008, 04:20 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mes5107
I think that most ADW's cannot sustain a 40-50% cut in revenues either. I can see from both sides, and I'm afraid there isn't one side that is right and one side that is wrong. I do agree that the ADW's are getting too much of a share right now.

Speaking about getting too much of a share, how about offshore books? Is there any possibility we could have them commingle their money into the US and Canada pools?
No, they are not legally taking bets, unless the USA approved offshore gambling
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2008, 04:22 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
They said they paid 277k, so if you take the 567k figure that Mes posted.

I have it as them paying 49% of the take back to the purses, so they are keeping 51% of it.

So 53% was incorrect, I am just trying to understand it, so I can figure out a solution, and then make a bunch of money on the solution
Yes, cause clearly the logical solution is that the money needs to be split up among more entities.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-04-2008, 04:48 PM
mes5107's Avatar
mes5107 mes5107 is offline
Golden Gate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jewett City, CT
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
They said they paid 277k, so if you take the 567k figure that Mes posted.

I have it as them paying 49% of the take back to the purses, so they are keeping 51% of it.

So 53% was incorrect, I am just trying to understand it, so I can figure out a solution, and then make a bunch of money on the solution
That 277k was paid for purses, however part of that time, what is now twinspires was still americatab, which was under Beulah for some of that time, skewing the numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-05-2008, 02:00 AM
rkinnin's Avatar
rkinnin rkinnin is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 106
Default

Meanwhile the following tracks are "dark" to ADW:

In CA:
Hollywood
Golden Gate

In TX:
Retama Park
Sam Houston
Lone Star

In OK
Remington Park

In OH:
Beluah
Thistledown

In PA:
Presque Isle Downs

In Fl:
Calder

In KY:
Churchhill Downs

Have I forgotten any? Whose next Bob???
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-06-2008, 02:22 AM
onebadbeast's Avatar
onebadbeast onebadbeast is offline
Washington Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: illinois
Posts: 872
Default

Its Time To Sh#t Or Get Off The Pot!
We Will All Take Our $$$ To Australia............
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-06-2008, 10:29 AM
rkinnin's Avatar
rkinnin rkinnin is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 106
Default

What are some of the ADW's that are "offshore" that are good?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-06-2008, 01:23 PM
jwkniska's Avatar
jwkniska jwkniska is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mt. Prospect, IL (AP)
Posts: 1,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkinnin
What are some of the ADW's that are "offshore" that are good?
unfortunately, if you're in the US, the offshore ones are now all illegal and banks will not take any checks from them (or their holding companies, or their std bank accounts). I used one, pinnacle, right before the gov't made them illegal, was located in Antigua, but checks came from Montreal (won an account with them thru an online contest).

gov't made them all illegal, as none of them take out the taxes on a good hit, like you'd see at the track.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-06-2008, 02:06 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwkniska
unfortunately, if you're in the US, the offshore ones are now all illegal and banks will not take any checks from them (or their holding companies, or their std bank accounts). I used one, pinnacle, right before the gov't made them illegal, was located in Antigua, but checks came from Montreal (won an account with them thru an online contest).

gov't made them all illegal, as none of them take out the taxes on a good hit, like you'd see at the track.
While I see what you are saying, the bold isn't true. I have a friend that just got a 4k check from The Greek and it cleared with flying colors.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.