#1
|
||||
|
||||
More carbon footprint bs
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Retarded dude.
The carbon footprint of a dog is twice that of an SUV? Do you really read this stuff and not stop to think about just how preposterous that is? That's about as likely as a study back about two years ago (funded by big pharma) that showed kids that got vaccines containing thimerosol ended up being more intelligent than those that didn't. The study was intended to dispute the idea that vaccines cause autism, and those tards actually went as far to say something as ludicrous as that. Oh, and even if that were true, it's all based on ridiculous premises. For starters, dogs would never eat corn, wheat, etc in their natural diet, which is what accounts for the majority of their supposed carbon footprint. I got my girlfriend to start going to my butcher for dogfood. Ground up beef, organs, bones. About $1.75 a pound, in frozen chubs, all grown locally from grass fed animals on his property. The only carbon used is the short transport of the animal to the butcher shop, the electricity used in butchering and the once a month drive to pick up a freezer load of the food. |