#1
|
||||
|
||||
Best Value Jockeys in the Country
To qualify they must average at least 500 mounts a year for the last five years:
#1: Miguel Perez - $2.31 #2: Kerwin Clark - $2.09 #3: Joel Rosario - $1.99 #4: Paco Lopez - $1.97 #5t: Alan Garcia - $1.95 #5t: Leandro Goncalves - $1.95 #7: Alonso Quinonez - $1.94 #8: Huber Villa-Gomez - $1.90 #9: Jose Lezcano - $1.88 #10t: Erik Rodriguez - $1.87 #10t: Diego Saenz - $1.87 Everyone else is below $1.82 - a ton of guys are in that $1.60 to $1.75 range. As for the worst ... Phil Teator's $1.09 edges out Inosencio Diego's $1.12 - but .. considering that Diego somehow achieved his $1.12 with over 4,000 total mounts .. he probably deserves the title of worst value in the land. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Value-----until they aren't.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
The only Kerwin I will bet is John.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Kerwin Clark shows a gigantic profit at Evangeline like every single year and he's been there for a long time.
How old is that guy? He rode Dispersal a couple of times. He's got to be a senior citizen. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Born on 4/18/1959 in Louisiana
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
That would be the case with Joel Rosario.
Going into 2008 - he was finishing in the top 3 with 45% of his mounts and his average odds at post time were 16/1 - and this from a sample of over 1,000 races. You're lucky if you see Rosario at 16/1 twice a week anymore ... and when you do, the horse probably is going to have the look of a 25/1 shot or more on paper. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Miguel Perez is 39 years old according to google.
Complete waste of talent I guess. Only made one half hearted attempt to make it at a major circuit .. went 2-for-20 in Southern Cal and left. In 2004, he rode 592 races - 14% wins - $2.65 ROI - the vast majority of these numbers compiled in Northern California at Golden Gate and Bay Meadows. Eventually left No. Cal for New Mexico. Zia Park: 2009: 22-for-112 ($2.42 ROI) 2008: 36-for-176 ($2.55 ROI) 2007: 19-for-80 ($4.22 ROI) Sunland Park: Profitable four of the five years he's ridden there He moved his tack to Emerald Downs this year for some reason ... At Emerald: 16-for-90 $3.43 ROI Not counted in any of these stats - In 2007, he won 40 of 172 quarter horse races - and had a $2.64 ROI |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Some guys like smaller tracks, less scrutiny, not unlike people who can't play sports in NY.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I'm curious as to what Paco Lopez' ROI at Monmouth was for their summer meet. I know it's a small sample, but it seems like his average win payout was 5 or 6:1
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It's not like Kerwin Clark at EVD or Calvin Borel at CD ... where some shady Cajun jock has taken complete ownership of a certain one race track .. and it's like they aren't that good everywhere else. I'd be more cynical about guys like Inosencio Diego and Marlon St. Julien - who consistently pound out numbers too bad to be true. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
how about Pabalo Fragoso?
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
$1.92
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Would need to get that stat off of Thoro-Graph's.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
what do John Jacinto's numbers look like over that span? That guy can ride a little.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
4,532 mounts - $1.77
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Not measurable because its all a fallacy.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I'm pretty sure there are a lot of posters here who would say all these numbers are completely irrelevant.
|