Pope rewards pedophile bshop with vacation retreat

[Mike]

Word has it that the holy see is being very attentive to this story. Does that mean this bishop gets omlettes with shrimp and feta?


http://www.google.com/hostednews/can...?docId=6573376

[clyde]

^^^^ Wears bunny suit for bed time.

[dellinger63]

As I suspected the bishop wasn't sent to a retreat but rather a convent or nunnery. They are more like retirement homes smelling of adult diapers than a wooded retreat. No boys and very few males for that matter.

I learned here, in previous discussions, that pedophilia is the urge to sexually interact with children with no preference for gender. Odd the bishop victimized his nephews leaving his neices alone and continued with the one nephew up until age 18. Pervert for sure but pedophile?

[Mike]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

As I suspected the bishop wasn't sent to a retreat but rather a convent or nunnery. They are more like retirement homes smelling of adult diapers than a wooded retreat. No boys and very few males for that matter.

I learned here, in previous discussions, that pedophilia is the urge to sexually interact with children with no preference for gender. Odd the bishop victimized his nephews leaving his neices alone and continued with the one nephew up until age 18. Pervert for sure but pedophile?

Congrats on your wagers yesterday, dell.

I wanted to find more info on this retreat, but went ahead with the provocative title of this thread anyways (as is often the spirit of this politics and society section)

Must agree with you on the bishops and priests choice of boys, almost exclusively, but that discussion will have to wait for another time

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Mike

Congrats on your wagers yesterday, dell.

I wanted to find more info on this retreat, but went ahead with the provocative title of this thread anyways (as is often the spirit of this politics and society section)

Must agree with you on the bishops and priests choice of boys, almost exclusively, but that discussion will have to wait for another time

Thanks on the wagers and having been raised in catholic schools the 'Pervert Priest' was a widely known phenomena and never involved girls. In high school despite the age difference I'd wager 95% plus molestations were consensual so not sure molestation is the correct term either.

[Mike]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Thanks on the wagers and having been raised in catholic schools the 'Pervert Priest' was a widely known phenomena and never involved girls. In high school despite the age difference I'd wager 95% plus molestations were consensual so not sure molestation is the correct term either.

I agree with you there, though that kind of talk will get the politically correct wing of today's experts in an uproar.

Here is a link to an article in my hometown's newspaper: http://www.reformer.com/localnews/ci_17789683

It's about a friend of mine, whom I've known casually for 25 years, who was falsely accused of the molestation of a girl under the age of 10 years old. The moral to this story is that one is not innocent until proven guilty when it comes to this crime allegation.

[timmgirvan]

...shoulda rewarded him with a flogging....see how much pleasure he got outta that!!

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

As I suspected the bishop wasn't sent to a retreat but rather a convent or nunnery. They are more like retirement homes smelling of adult diapers than a wooded retreat. No boys and very few males for that matter.

I learned here, in previous discussions, that pedophilia is the urge to sexually interact with children with no preference for gender. Odd the bishop victimized his nephews leaving his neices alone and continued with the one nephew up until age 18. Pervert for sure but pedophile?

Del you are so fucl<ing stupid. Just thought you should know that.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Mike

Congrats on your wagers yesterday, dell.

I wanted to find more info on this retreat, but went ahead with the provocative title of this thread anyways (as is often the spirit of this politics and society section)

Must agree with you on the bishops and priests choice of boys, almost exclusively, but that discussion will have to wait for another time

no Del just believes that Homosexuals are pedophiles. Good luck with that discussion.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

no Del just believes that Homosexuals are pedophiles. Good luck with that discussion.

No I just don't buy into the apparent fact pedophiles have no gender preference. I know there are probably more than 100X of abuses involving hetros specifically adult males and young females but the problem in the Catholic Church has little to do with society in general. I know it's far from politically correct since the vast majority of offenders are in the minority, statistically.

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

No I just don't buy into the apparent fact pedophiles have no gender preference. I know there are probably more than 100X of abuses involving hetros specifically adult males and young females but the problem in the Catholic Church has little to do with society in general. I know it's far from politically correct since the vast majority of offenders are in the minority, statistically.

as usual i'm not really sure what you're trying to say since you post in some sort of weird private language that comes off as mumbly gibberish and i can only guess at the ideas lurking underneath.

i think there might be a fallacy in your logic but i'm not actually sure since you seem to be talking out of both sides of your mouth simultaneously.

are homosexual's more likely to be pedophiles than heterosexuals? if you believe that, what's the evidence that led you to that conclusion?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

are homosexual's more likely to be pedophiles than heterosexuals? if you believe that, what's the evidence that led you to that conclusion?

I would say that homosexuals and heterosexuals are equally likely to be pedophiles. That said because there are far more heteros in the country/world, incidents involving them would be far greater, in proportion to their numbers. I just think the pedophile who has victimized both genders is far more rare than those that have targeted a single gender.

What's happened in the Catholic church is unique and needs to be treated as such. Those same bishops and pastors who gladly accepted money every Sunday and every other chance they got while either participating, covering up or looking the other way need to pay back to the victims EVERYTHING they collected.

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

I would say that homosexuals and heterosexuals are equally likely to be pedophiles. That said because there are far more heteros in the country/world, incidents involving them would be far greater, in proportion to their numbers. I just think the pedophile who has victimized both genders is far more rare than those that have targeted a single gender.

What's happened in the Catholic church is unique and needs to be treated as such. Those same bishops and pastors who gladly accepted money every Sunday and every other chance they got while either participating, covering up or looking the other way need to pay back to the victims EVERYTHING they collected.

stated so clearly there is nothing i disagree with here. you should practice this kind of posting more often.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

No I just don't buy into the apparent fact pedophiles have no gender preference. I know there are probably more than 100X of abuses involving hetros specifically adult males and young females but the problem in the Catholic Church has little to do with society in general. I know it's far from politically correct since the vast majority of offenders are in the minority, statistically.

I agree with you that most priests seem to like little boys.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

I agree with you that most priests seem to like little boys.

but that contradicts the accepted theory that pedophiles are not gender specific ?

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

but that contradicts the accepted theory that pedophiles are not gender specific ?

I think this is a matter of availability....priests in general have more access to boys than girls.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

I think this is a matter of availability....priests in general have more access to boys than girls.

That definitely is a factor especially in the case of all boys high schools. However once past puberty I'm not sure a pedophile would still be attracted. I also find the fact that pedophiles can not only distinguish their sexual preference but also display it through symbols on jewelry etc. flies in the face of the accepted theory they have no gender preference. I'm just glad law inforcement hasn't accepted it.

http://www.wikileaks.ch/wiki/FBI_pedophile_symbols

[Antitrust32]

you are confused.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

you are confused.

No I think psychologists who have somehow come to the conclusion that individual pedophiles do not have any gender preference are confused.

When a child molester boards a plane for Thailand do you think he/she will hire which ever gender comes their way or do they know which sex they are looking for? I obviously think the later. Child molestation is IMO one of the most horrible crimes there is as the victim is always completely innocent. To not recognize the signs and clues because of some false, accepted, theory is dangerous.

BTW I know far more girls who were molested than I do boys despite attending 12 years of catholic school. And they are all forever injured some far worse than others.

[AeWingnut]

if all the priests you ever met were gay and liked little boys why would you think there were some that weren't.