Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-07-2012, 02:17 PM
GenuineRisk's Avatar
GenuineRisk GenuineRisk is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,986
Default But let's talk about what's really important...

... which is that in the California porn industry, condoms are now state-mandated safety equipment.

(I just like using "condom" and "state-mandated safety equipment" in the same sentence. Heh.)
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2012, 02:20 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk View Post
... which is that in the California porn industry, condoms are now state-mandated safety equipment.

(I just like using "condom" and "state-mandated safety equipment" in the same sentence. Heh.)
how would you like being the osha inspector on a call relating to a 'safety equipment' violation?
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2012, 02:24 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk View Post
... which is that in the California porn industry, condoms are now state-mandated safety equipment.

(I just like using "condom" and "state-mandated safety equipment" in the same sentence. Heh.)
Who will be in charge of enforcement?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2012, 02:32 PM
bigrun's Avatar
bigrun bigrun is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: VA/PA/KY
Posts: 5,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
how would you like being the osha inspector on a call relating to a 'safety equipment' violation?

I'd like that job but only if i inspected the female violaters..
__________________
"If you lose the power to laugh, you lose the power to think" - Clarence Darrow, American lawyer (1857-1938)

When you are right, no one remembers;when you are wrong, no one forgets.

Thought for today.."No persons are more frequently wrong, than those who will not admit
they are wrong" - Francois, Duc de la Rochefoucauld, French moralist (1613-1680)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2012, 02:33 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk View Post
... which is that in the California porn industry, condoms are now state-mandated safety equipment.

(I just like using "condom" and "state-mandated safety equipment" in the same sentence. Heh.)
hahahah. free country, eh.

i prefer my porn latex free, though i have no idea why.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2012, 02:33 PM
bigrun's Avatar
bigrun bigrun is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: VA/PA/KY
Posts: 5,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Who will be in charge of enforcement?
Long Dong Silver..
__________________
"If you lose the power to laugh, you lose the power to think" - Clarence Darrow, American lawyer (1857-1938)

When you are right, no one remembers;when you are wrong, no one forgets.

Thought for today.."No persons are more frequently wrong, than those who will not admit
they are wrong" - Francois, Duc de la Rochefoucauld, French moralist (1613-1680)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2012, 02:47 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

They say the law will require the Los Angeles Department of Public Health to visit the film sets to monitor whether condoms are being used. Leave it to the brilliant citizens here in Los Angeles to pass this law and waste resources. It would be one thing if the city was doing well financially. But that is not the case. The city is very short on money and every government agency is spread really thin. These city and state agencies barely have the resources to do their jobs right now. Where are they going to get the resources to satisfy this new law?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-2012, 02:55 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin View Post
They say the law will require the Los Angeles Department of Public Health to visit the film sets to monitor whether condoms are being used. Leave it to the brilliant citizens here in Los Angeles to pass this law and waste resources. It would be one thing if the city was doing well financially. But that is not the case. The city is very short on money and every government agency is spread really thin. These city and state agencies barely have the resources to do their jobs right now. Where are they going to get the resources to satisfy this new law?
that and if a porn company doesnt like the new law, they can move shop to another state and take their $$ out of Cali completely.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-07-2012, 03:03 PM
Honu's Avatar
Honu Honu is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,450
Default

The state of California and its cities need to take a few lessons from single mom's who have to live within a budget. The whole condom thing came about because the porn capitol of the world Simi-Valley had some actors and actress's come back testing positive for HIV.
__________________

Horses are like strawberries....they can go bad overnight. Charlie Whittingham
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-07-2012, 03:11 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32 View Post
that and if a porn company doesnt like the new law, they can move shop to another state and take their $$ out of Cali completely.
I hope that doesn't happen. What will I do for work?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-07-2012, 04:02 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin View Post
I hope that doesn't happen. What will I do for work?
you'll have to travel outside the LA county!

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...-leave-la.html
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-07-2012, 04:32 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32 View Post
you'll have to travel outside the LA county!

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...-leave-la.html
I wonder when the new law takes effect. I just signed a deal to star in a new film titled "Big Daddy Long Leg". I'm wondering if we will have to film it in a neighboring county.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-07-2012, 05:34 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Rupert, I like the name of your new film ...

Seriously, though - this was needed, because they just went through some massive infectious disease transmissions like last year or something (AIDS, etc) in the porn industry where people got sick and several died.

Hey - it's OSHA type stuff
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-07-2012, 05:57 PM
cal828 cal828 is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,929
Default

I hope they resolve this problem to everyone's mutual "satisfaction."
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-07-2012, 06:14 PM
pointmanscousin
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Honu View Post
The state of California and its cities need to take a few lessons from single mom's who have to live within a budget. The whole condom thing came about because the porn capitol of the world Simi-Valley had some actors and actress's come back testing positive for HIV.
Uhm, is this topic something you should be commenting?


Another reason you should not, it's best to leave the nincompoopense to Genuine Crazy Lady and Yakity Danny.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-07-2012, 08:49 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Too bad Prop. 37 failed...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:12 PM
Honu's Avatar
Honu Honu is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek View Post
Too bad Prop. 37 failed...
It was very poorly written, it needs to be re-written and brought back at a later date.
__________________

Horses are like strawberries....they can go bad overnight. Charlie Whittingham
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:46 PM
GenuineRisk's Avatar
GenuineRisk GenuineRisk is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Honu View Post
It was very poorly written, it needs to be re-written and brought back at a later date.
Was that the one about GMO labeling?
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:54 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk View Post
Was that the one about GMO labeling?
yes
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:52 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek View Post
Too bad Prop. 37 failed...
The big companies like Monsanto spent about $50 million to defeat Prop 37. They know that if people see products labeled as GMO, and there are alternative products that are not genetically modified, people will go with the alternative choice.

The campaign against 37 was a based on a bunch of lies. They outspent the Yes on 37 people by about 10x. In the end, all the lies fooled people into voting "no". I don't know how anyone in their right mind could vote "no". How could it be a bad thing to have products labeled?

One of the phony arguments against 37 was that it would only apply to certain products. In reality, it was going to apply to any products that were relevant and that the state had jurisdiction over. It couldn't be applied to meat because the USDA is the governing body that oversees meat. It couldn't be applied to alcohol because the FAA oversees the labeling on alcohol.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.