Obama Pays Respects to Serial Abuser/Pediphile

[dellinger63]

And bowed to him when he was alive.

A 48 year old man marrying and impregnating a 15 year old, having 30 wives, beating a woman for divorcing him, and then using his sons to beat and imprison their adult sisters is to be spit on, not respected.

In 1972, when he was 48, King Abdullah took a 15-year-old Jordanian-born wife, Alanoud Al-Fayez. The marriage was arranged; she was one of 30 wives. In four years, she produced four daughters — infuriating the king, who wanted more sons. (He only has seven sons — and 15 known daughters.)

For this crime, Abdullah divorced Alanoud. But he beat her, too, and prevented her from taking care of her daughters when they were ill. In 2001, she fled the kingdom, hoping that as a father, Abdullah would treat his own daughters with more kindness.

She was wrong. In addition to having a mother who “got away,” these daughters, Sahar, Maha, Hala and Jawaher Al Saud, now in their late 30s and early 40s, dared speak out for women’s rights. Their punishment has been extreme and long-lasting.

The princesses are seen with their father, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz. From left: Sahar, Jawaher, Hala (on the king’s shoulders) and Maha.

For 13 years, the unmarried princesses have been confined in pairs, isolated from outside contact — beaten, drugged, deprived of food and water for periods of time, slowly starved, subjected to heat without air-conditioning in the desert clime.

According to their mother’s account, and to a video that Sahar and Jawaher smuggled out, the princesses claim that their “half-brothers beat them with sticks” and “yell at us and tell us we will die here.”

Sahar also told The Post, “My father said that after his death, our brothers would continue to detain us and abuse us.”

http://nypost.com/2015/01/27/the-fou...-muslim-women/

At least the new King ignored Michelle Obama, who was accompanying the President as opposed to slapping her. The Saudi media showed how progressive they've become by simply blurring Michelle's face.Baby steps!

First lady Michelle Obama’s face was reportedly blurred by Saudi state television Tuesday as she and the president met with new Saudi King Salman in Riyadh, although officials deny the claim.

The new Saudi king shook hands with President Obama at the Erga Palace but did not acknowledge the first lady at all during a brief aside at the funeral for King Abdullah, Bloomberg View reported.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-state-televi/

[Kasept]

But it was OK for the Bushes to suck his cock and do his bidding for years?

[Pants II]

They continue to do so after his death, Steve.

But

ROFL

The Kingdom is the largest shareholder of Faux News outside of Murdoch, Dell.

Think about how many times stories have been edited by Faux concerning THE KINGDOM.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Kasept

But it was OK for the Bushes to suck his cock and do his bidding for years?

FDR started the circle jerk. And no it was not OK for the Bushes especially the 'scuttling' of the investigation of who (Saudis) financed the 9-11 attackers and enabling those suspected (Saudis) to flee.

My question is why the crime of impregnating a child, and one with no free will, OK and ignored because of where on this earth it occurred?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Pants II

The Kingdom is the largest shareholder of Faux News outside of Murdoch, Dell.

Think about how many times stories have been edited by Faux concerning THE KINGDOM.

And Giuliani told him to stick his $10 million. Probably why he's never on FOX

Instead of arguing which party swallows better can't we unite and condemn this man for what he did during his life?

[jms62]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

And Giuliani told him to stick his $10 million. Probably why he's never on FOX

Instead of arguing which party swallows better can't we unite and condemn this man for what he did during his life?

Well that would be nice BUT you are the one that threw the first punch without expecting it to be called that your guy was doing the same thing or worse. The title says it all

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Kasept

But it was OK for the Bushes to suck his cock and do his bidding for years?

Not bad at kissing either

[mark2061mn]

:

Originally Posted by jms62

Well that would be nice BUT you are the one that threw the first punch without expecting it to be called that your guy was doing the same thing or worse. The title says it all

[Danzig]

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...important.html



The longtime coziness between the oil kingdom and the leader of the free world has gone cold for some time and turned frigid in 2013, when Obama refrained from bombing Syria and undertook negotiations with Iran—the Saudis’ two main enemies. Those moves came in the wake of Obama’s abandonment of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, their main ally, during the Arab Spring protests of 2011.

At the low point, Saudi Arabia’s intelligence chief and former longtime ambassador to Washington, Prince Bandar Sultan al-Saud, publicly grumbled that the kingdom was losing trust in Obama’s judgment and might reassess the whole web of relations between the two powers.

Obama didn’t panic over the threat, nor did he need to. Bandar’s rhetorical flourishes coincided with, and may have reflected, a weakening of Saudi power—its standing as the world’s largest petroleum supplier, the basis of its international influence, having just been overtaken by the United States. For once, they needed our arms more than we needed their oil.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Instead of arguing which party swallows better can't we unite and condemn this man for what he did during his life?

Thought so....zzzzzz

chirp-chirp-chirp

[Pants II]

Dell it is not an issue worth discussing. Americans will have to learn the hard way.

Side note...

Glancing over the quote from the Slate article...heh. I guess the Sauds are losing influence. They have absolutely nothing to do with the plunge in oil.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Pants II

Dell it is not an issue worth discussing. Americans will have to learn the hard way.

What's sad is if the King was abusing his dogs like he did his women, Americans would be all over him.

[somerfrost]

Foreign policy is a bitch, on the one hand we stand behind perverts like this guy, on the other hand we selectively take on other bad guys like Saddam, Kadafi and the Shaw and we end up with worse...the enemy of my enemy is my friend...if only the real world was that simple.

[GenuineRisk]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-...b_4840060.html

[Pants II]

King of Michigan?

ROFL

Why not post a link to Savior Bill and the Epstein Factory?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-...b_4840060.html

when huckabee was on the daily show, and john stewart showed video of him playing bass alongside ted nugent, i was really hoping he'd bring up the underage girl...the one ted had 'custody' of.

[dellinger63]

With such virulent condemnation of the King's crimes against women (actually his wives and daughters) by our two resident feminists, change is surely coming.

I suppose as long as there's an abortion clinic, within easy driving distance, for every woman in the U.S. and all female law students at Georgetown are afforded free BC, all is good in this world.

[Kasept]

Originally Posted by Pants II

They continue to do so after his death, Steve.

But

ROFL

The Kingdom is the largest shareholder of Faux News outside of Murdoch, Dell.

Think about how many times stories have been edited by Faux concerning THE KINGDOM.

Coach..

Timely notes pertaining to your contributions..

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/us...aeda.html?_r=0

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...to-1-from-6-6-

[Kasept]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

FDR started the circle jerk. And no it was not OK for the Bushes especially the 'scuttling' of the investigation of who (Saudis) financed the 9-11 attackers and enabling those suspected (Saudis) to flee.

My question is why the crime of impregnating a child, and one with no free will, OK and ignored because of where on this earth it occurred?

You really can't help yourself. FDR? So strategic alliances trying to win WWII doesn't measure up as a bona fide reason to open relations with Saudi Arabia? You'll twist yourself into a pretzel to tie anything to a perceived malfeasance by Democratic management.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Kasept

You really can't help yourself. FDR? So strategic alliances trying to win WWII doesn't measure up as a bona fide reason to open relations with Saudi Arabia? You'll twist yourself into a pretzel to tie anything to a perceived malfeasance by Democratic management.

Can we stop the pissing match and simply focus on the condemnation of the barbaric, backwards culture that allows a 48 year old to 'own' a 15 year old bride. Regardless of party or President?