Hillary is guilty, and Russia has the proof

[joeydb]

Posting is here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-0...-perfect-storm

"While all of this has been going on, intelligence community sources have reported about a below the radar screen, yet largely known debate in the Kremlin between the Russian Foreign Ministry and the Russian Intelligence Services. They are trying to come to a meeting of the minds to determine whether the Russian government should release some 20,000 of Mrs. Clinton’s emails that it obtained either by hacking her directly or by hacking into the email of her confidante, Sid Blumenthal."

Bernie Sanders is wise to stay in because there is a real possibility that she may have to withdraw from the race. The perp walk and new orange jumpsuit would be a bonus if we can get it.

[OldDog]

and then it's bring on Uncle Joe and fauxchahontas

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by OldDog

and then it's bring on Uncle Joe and fauxchahontas

LOL - that took me a second but I like the fauxchahontas reference. Was it 1/16th or 1/32nd native american blood that Senator Warren claimed to have?

Very convenient at that point when all the debates are over to substitute them. At least then they'd have reason for ignoring the will of the people than the stupid superdelegate system.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by joeydb

LOL - that took me a second but I like the fauxchahontas reference. Was it 1/16th or 1/32nd native american blood that Senator Warren claimed to have?

Very convenient at that point when all the debates are over to substitute them. At least then they'd have reason for ignoring the will of the people than the stupid superdelegate system.

1/32. but if she is, then it's not a claim. I hope she stays in the senate, irritating wall street. she can do more there than she can as vp.
as for the will of the people...the parties are private, they are not government entities. each states party decides how to do their primaries. tell me, what do you think of the gop gerrymandering after the 2010 census? or does that part of the election process not bother you?

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by Danzig

1/32. but if she is, then it's not a claim. I hope she stays in the senate, irritating wall street. she can do more there than she can as vp.
as for the will of the people...the parties are private, they are not government entities. each states party decides how to do their primaries. tell me, what do you think of the gop gerrymandering after the 2010 census? or does that part of the election process not bother you?

And the Democrats haven't gerrymandered? Remember some of those crazy districts put together just to ensure minority majority within the district?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by joeydb

And the Democrats haven't gerrymandered? Remember some of those crazy districts put together just to ensure minority majority within the district?

you do know who draws the states maps after a census? who drew them after 2010? it's why, altho the elections show a lot more votes for dems than reps, the reps hold both houses of congress.
I support what cali and ar have done, having non partisan boards draw the maps. gerrymandering is supposed to be banned, yet it still happens. one of the many things wrong with our political system.

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by Danzig

you do know who draws the states maps after a census? who drew them after 2010? it's why, altho the elections show a lot more votes for dems than reps, the reps hold both houses of congress.
I support what cali and ar have done, having non partisan boards draw the maps. gerrymandering is supposed to be banned, yet it still happens. one of the many things wrong with our political system.

Ideally even a non-partisan board wouldn't be necessary. Computers could draw districts depending on the population density, which is what is supposed to drive the districts in the first place within the state borders. The census data could be fed into an algorithm to adjust the district and show the before and after maps to make sure nothing crazy happened.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by joeydb

Ideally even a non-partisan board wouldn't be necessary. Computers could draw districts depending on the population density, which is what is supposed to drive the districts in the first place within the state borders. The census data could be fed into an algorithm to adjust the district and show the before and after maps to make sure nothing crazy happened.

that would work too. anything that takes it out of the hands of a party, I'm all for it.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by joeydb

Ideally even a non-partisan board wouldn't be necessary. Computers could draw districts depending on the population density, which is what is supposed to drive the districts in the first place within the state borders. The census data could be fed into an algorithm to adjust the district and show the before and after maps to make sure nothing crazy happened.

Great Idea

[Alabama Stakes]

Originally Posted by joeydb

LOL - that took me a second but I like the fauxchahontas reference. Was it 1/16th or 1/32nd native american blood that Senator Warren claimed to have?

Very convenient at that point when all the debates are over to substitute them. At least then they'd have reason for ignoring the will of the people than the stupid superdelegate system.

I'm smokin this choky weed I call the "chokahontas"
So if I were to puff a bat of this with Liz it would be, as underdog would say
" a little chokahontas with fauxchahontas action . "

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by jms62

Great Idea

Maybe I'll prototype something one of these days. It would be a neat project, and both sides have people who would be interested in it.

I'd use a small sample set and show how the algorithm would work. Scaling it up to handling the residences of 300+ million citizens would be exponentially more difficult.

[richard burch]

anything to bring her down is fine with me.

love that Putin!!!!


this is a good one too and that liberal CNN will never play, only Trumps phone calls are targets.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YS2TB3iTzOE