#1
|
||||
|
||||
I want your opinion on this...
... I've made mention to this yesterday, but I can't get this off of my mind. I'm not trying to scrunge up any conspiracies, but I still think I got screwed a little.
I hit the $1 exacta on the BC mile yesterday. 24-1 over 5-1 right? It only paid $12 off the $1. I think it should've been closer to $200. Here's why- It's a 14 horse field, there's an ass-load of handle which were making for nice payouts all day, and I had a longshot over like the 2nd or 3rd favroite... I was just realy disappointed by the payoff? Am I justified?
__________________
Facebook- Peter May Jr. Twitter- @pmayjr You wouldn't be ballin' if your name was Spauldin' If y'all fresh to death, then I'm deceased... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I think $246 is right. Out of curiosity, why do you think it should have paid more?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
and you also have to keep in mind that the odds dont have anything to do with the exacta payouts. Although they are an indicator.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I know win odds and exacta payouts are 2 different animals. But they usually are indicators or what an exacta could be. I figured with the big 14 horse field, a few luke-warm favortes, and the fact that a longshot came in on top, and a big handle: I thought I deserved more. Also payoffs all day were coming in big.
__________________
Facebook- Peter May Jr. Twitter- @pmayjr You wouldn't be ballin' if your name was Spauldin' If y'all fresh to death, then I'm deceased... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|